Akkamma vs M H Hanumanthegowda on 27 May, 2011

0
105
Karnataka High Court
Akkamma vs M H Hanumanthegowda on 27 May, 2011
Author: H N Das
}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA1,{f,RE

DATED THIS THE 271% DAY OF MAY; :2o:{: % ~  f i _

BEFORE    

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE 

R.S»A.No.586;;C§:;§}Q5
BETWEEN:

SMTAKKADJIMA
VWO LATE 1:>_cHENN.ARA} . ‘
AGED ABOUT 53:.§z5,a3s I
AGRICULTUREST«, _ . ~ _ _.–

R/A ;r»:&1;LNAHA1,3;; Vi:mG}:T’fi’.– V’ V’ ‘
NAGArv1A1§IgAL;¢; _, ” ”

Ex/D’–‘xE-\1’D’\:’;'{ DIS’fRIf€’f1″. ‘

.APPELLANT
(By SR1 TARA:<1A:::4u§i}.si§;ADxf'\.'%v}'QR SMT.M.}1/OTHI, ADV.)

– .Ai…;’DVi”

$3.HiHA:\:2§:;<r}u\ITHEGoxMDA

'£%;ED§T{;?£\§I;%j_\i"EEivE'{3OWDA
AGED 'ABOUT YEARS

V V' _ AGRECSEJLTUREST

_ gm ::«:*3m;é$~éAaALL1 VILLAGE:
.E\?53xGA3x!iAl\?G;%_LA TALLIK

'*:x;:;~,z;r:}':_éA ':;1:::r:«2:<:5.

E }L£KK.APPA<}©'WE3z§

" u . V' A1\T,\E'£i’€::’ET’fi,:*’:

__ __ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _.

. . 1 ._ . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. ……. .. .. .. .. ..

.. .. . , .. …………………………………. ..

9

10. E: is needless to say the cause of ectien fer..;ieefe_e~e»f

permanent injunction is a recurring cause of 361103.” *:’:1¢:’efe;¢=’;–e

the plaintiff is alvezxys entitled to initiisitehepprjQpria:e_f§’I’baceedVings”A

against any person who imtereferes W-é:hW.her p:isse:s§en’3–. é”1:d”..

enjoyment 05 her property at a11§=._’:i1:”:e. Timugii no: for the
reasons stated in the judgement of first §”‘:p’§>e Ha_:e Cour: the same
is confirmed for 4:h’e,__rease’fiS’Vsteted’a}§eee; I the reasons stated

and the e¥%>$’e1%;e.ti’e1’;–S.e_ §’r1~a_d.e. “‘4’£ib’ii} ‘\f?:V,’ ‘ the appea} is hereby

safe
EUBGE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *