High Court Kerala High Court

Alan Mon.M.V vs University Of Kerla on 4 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Alan Mon.M.V vs University Of Kerla on 4 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33555 of 2010(T)


1. ALAN MON.M.V,S/O.VALSALA.M.S,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNIVERSITY OF KERLA, REP.BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY

3. HINDUSTAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING ARIPPA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.R.VENKETESH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :04/11/2010

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
             --------------------------------------------------
            W.P.(C) NOs. 33555 & 33562 OF 2010
           ------------------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioners are 3rd semester B. Tech students in the 3rd

respondent college. It is stated that they appeared for Ist and 11nd

year combined examination and the result of which was declared

on 16.10.2010. Referring to Ext.P2 downloaded from the website of

the respondent University, petitioners submit that, their results are

withheld, with the endorsement “suspected malpractices”.

2. It is stated that the 3rd semester examination is to

commence on 10.11.2010 and although at present no proceedings

have been initiated against them, the hall tickets for the

examination are not issued by the University. It is in these

circumstances this writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to

the respondent to issue hall tickets in order to enable them to

appear for the 3rd semester examination.

3. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the

respondent University also.

WPC.Nos. 33555 & 33562/10
:2 :

4. As at present, apart from withholding the results as

indicated in Ext.P2 referred to above, no proceedings have been

initiated by the University and no final order also has been passed

imposing any punishment against the petitioners. Therefore, as at

present, the petitioners cannot be prevented from appearing for the

3rd semester examination.

5. However, having regard to the fact that the University is

still at liberty to initiate action against the petitioners, even if the

petitioners are now permitted to appear for the 3rd semester

examination, if they are found guilty of any malpractices, the

petitioners will not be eligible to claim any benefit on the basis

that they have appeared for the 3rd semester examination.

Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the

University to issue hall tickets to the petitioners and permit them to

appear for the 3rd semester examination commencing on

10.11.2010. However, it is clarified that, in case any further

WPC.Nos. 33555 & 33562/10
:3 :

proceedings are initiated against the petitioners and the order

passed by the University is adverse to them, they will not be

entitled to any benefit on the basis that they have appeared for the

3rd semester examination.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/