IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 6977 of 2010(V)
1. ALL KERALA RENTAL BUILDING OWNER'S
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent
2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
For Petitioner :SRI.SANTHOSH THOMAS KANDAMCHIRA
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Dated :18/03/2010
O R D E R
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
----------------------------------
WP(C). No.6977 of 2010
----------------------------------
Dated this the 18th day of March, 2010
J U D G M E N T
———————-
Pius C.Kuriakose,J.
Even though Sri. V.N. Sasidharan, learned counsel
for the writ petitioner addressed very persuasive arguments,
we are not inclined to direct the 1st respondent to consider and
dispose of Ext.P2 representation as requested by him. We
notice that Ext.P1 judgment has already been passed by this
court drawing the attention of the Government to the grievance
voiced by the petitioner in that writ petition (substantially the
same as the grievance voiced by the present writ petitioner)
and directed the Government to bestow proper attention on the
issue and take appropriate remedial measures. According to us
Ext.P1 takes care of the grievance of the petitioner also. If the
petitioner has a specific grievance that this court did not fix any
time limit in Ext.P1 it is for the petitioner to move for review or
modification of Ext.P1. With the above observations the writ
petition is dismissed.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb