Amarjit Singh vs Commissioner on 24 December, 2008

0
105
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Amarjit Singh vs Commissioner on 24 December, 2008
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH


                                     CWP No. 21169 of 2008
                                     Date of Decision: 24.12.2008



Amarjit Singh

                                                 ....Petitioner


                         Versus



Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar & others

                                                 ...Respondents


CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.S. Khehar.
        Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur


Present:-    Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. P.C. Goyal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab
             for respondents No.1 to 3.

             Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate
             with Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Advocate
             for respondents No.5 and 6.


J.S. KHEHAR, J. (ORAL)

A perusal of the dasti notice issued to respondent No.4

reveals that respondent No.4 has been duly served. Respondent no.4 is

neither present in the Court in person nor represented through counsel.

Respondent no.4 is, accordingly, proceeded against ex-parte.

Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 acknowledges that

the observations recorded by the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division,

Jalandhar, while passing the order dated 05-08-2008 (Annexure P-12)

to the effect that he did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the
CWP No. 21169 of 2008 -2-

controversy, was misconceived and as such, he has no objection, if the

order dated 05-08-2008 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to

the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar, requiring him to

re-adjudicate the same on merits.

Although, the submission made at the hands of learned

counsel representing respondents No.1 to 3 is opposed by learned counsel

representing respondents No.5 and 6, we are satisfied that the issue is

purely legal in as much as the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division,

Jalandhar was fully competent to dispose of the matter on merits, yet under

some mistaken belief, he has chosen to hold that it is only this Court which

is competent to decide the same on merits. As such, we are of the view

that the ends of justice would be met if the impugned order dated

05-08-2008 passed by the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar is

set aside, and the matter is remanded back to the Commissioner,

Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar, requiring him to adjudicate the same on

merits after affording an opportunity of hearing to the rival parties.

Accordingly, the impugned order dated 05-08-2008 (Annexure

P-12) is, hereby, set aside and the matter is remanded back to the

Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar. The rival parties are directed

to appear before the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar on

19-01-2009.

Writ Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.




                                                 (J.S. KHEHAR)
                                                     JUDGE


                                              (NIRMALJIT KAUR)
December 24, 2008                                  JUDGE
gurpreet
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *