Amarsinhji vs Bhati on 7 February, 2011

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/9326/2010	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 9326 of 2010
 

In


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) No. 9788 of 2010
 

In
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10846 of 2009
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

AMARSINHJI
DOLATSINHJI BHATI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

BHATI
SAJJANKUNVARBA NAHARSINH & 6 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
MRUGEN K PUROHIT for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1, 
RULE SERVED for
Respondent(s) : 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.4, 1.2.5,1.2.7 - 6. 
RULE NOT
RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 1.2.3  
RULE UNSERVED for
Respondent(s) : 1.2.6  
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Respondent(s) :
7, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 07/02/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard.

On the facts and circumstances of the case, sufficient cause is shown
to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the
application is granted. Rule is made absolute with no order as to
costs.

(K.S.JHAVERI,J.)

pawan

Top