High Court Kerala High Court

Ambrose Joseph vs The State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ambrose Joseph vs The State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 36710 of 2007(T)


1. AMBROSE JOSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KERALA,

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CBCID,

4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,

5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

6. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :11/01/2008

 O R D E R
                             V. RAMKUMAR , J.
               ==========================
                   W.P.(C). No. 36710 of 2007
               ==========================
               Dated this the 11th day of January, 2008.

                                 JUDGMENT

In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, the petitioner who is the brother of deceased Dominic, seeks a

direction to transfer the investigation of crime No. 111/2007 of

Kadinamkulam Police Station. to the 3rd respondent, Superintendent of

Police, CBCID, Thiruvananthapuram or any other competent

independent investigating agency for proper, effective and expeditious

investigation regarding the cause of death of Dominic, the brother of

the petitioner.

2. The body of Dominic aged 49 years who was the brother of

the petitioner was found in his residence on 07.08.2007 at 7 a.m.

There are rival versions regarding the stage of the body when it was

first found. According to the daughter of Dominic the body was found

hanging in the bedroom. But going by the version of the son of

Dominic the body was lying on a cot. There appears to be some

attempt on the part of the inmates of the house to stifle the truth.

Whatever that may be, the dead body of Dominic was hurriedly buried

on 07.08.2007 itself. Even though it was evidently a case of unnatural

death, nobody seem to have informed the police and the burial was

W.P.(C) NO. 36710/2007 : 2 :

conducted on the same day without the police being informed. It was

long thereafter on 23.08.2007 that the sister of the deceased lodged a

complaint before the Kadinamkulam Police which registered the

aforesaid crime under the caption “unnatural death” under Section 174

Cr.P.C. On a complaint lodged by the petitioner before the RDO,

Thiruvananthapuram, the dead body of Dominic was exhumed and

subjected to autopsy. Ext.P2 is the postmortem certificate wherein

there were two injuries on the back of the head and the opinion as to

the cause of death also was that the death was due to head injury.

According to the petitioner, the investigation by the local police has

been tardy and the petitioner suspects that the death of Dominic was

homicidal and he also suspects the influence of the culprits behind the

slow pace in the investigation and hence this writ petition for

transferring the investigation to crime branch.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor in charge of the case submitted

that there has been no lethargy on the part of the investigating agency

in proceeding with the investigation and that the inmates of the house

namely the son, daughter and son-in-law of the deceased are being

subjected to polygraph test to ascertain whether the statement given

by them reflect the true story behind the death of Dominic.

W.P.(C) NO. 36710/2007 : 3 :

4. Even though the investigation had commenced on

23.08.2007, so far, no tangible progress has been shown in the

investigation and the theory of suicide which the inmates of the house

wanted the rest of the world to accept, prima facie, does not appear to

be true in view of the postmortem findings. Such being the position,

the investigation should be entrusted in the hands of a team which is

better equipped to unravel the real truth behind the death of Dominic.

Hence, without making any observations regarding the investigation

thus far conducted by the local police, I direct the investigation to be

entrusted with the 3rd respondent, the Superintendent of Police,

CBCID, Thiruvananthapuram. The 3rd respondent shall immediately

constitute a team of competent officers and continue the investigation

and file a final report before the court concerned expeditiously after

exploring all possibilities in the matter.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

rv

W.P.(C) NO. 36710/2007 : 4 :