High Court Kerala High Court

Ameerali K.P. Kuttichi P.O vs State Of Kerala Repd. By The Public on 4 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ameerali K.P. Kuttichi P.O vs State Of Kerala Repd. By The Public on 4 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6516 of 2008()


1. AMEERALI K.P. KUTTICHI P.O.,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. YAHIYA, THEKKEVALAPPU,
3. N.MUNEER, UDUMBUMTHALA, SOUTH
4. SAVAD, S/O.ABOOBACKER, K.K.P.
5. IMTHIYAS N, VADAKKEKOVVAL,
6. KUTTY RASHEED @ ABDUL RASHEED B.,
7. NASEER, B/O. KOLLI SHAREEF, AYITY,
8. MOOSA, BAKKIRIMUKKU, MAIDANI P.O.

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPD. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANJAY

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :04/12/2008

 O R D E R
                             K.HEMA, J.

                 -----------------------------------------
                        B.A.No. 6516 of 2008
                 -----------------------------------------

               Dated this the 4th December, 2008

                              O R D E R

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148,

452, 427 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code. According to

prosecution, on 8.10.2008 at about 8 PM, petitioners, due to prior

enmity, in furtherance of a common intention committed house

trespass into the office of the CPI(M) and destroyed window glasses

and committed mischief. Petitioners are accused 1 to 3, 4, 5 and 6.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that accused 1 to 3

and 6 are already arrested and petitioners 7 and 8 are not arrayed

as accused in the crime.

4. There is no representation for petitioners consecutively for

the third time.

On considering the nature of allegations made and the nature

of investigation required, I am not satisfied that it is a fit case to

grant anticipatory bail. Petitioners 7 and 8 being not accused in the

crime, anticipatory bail cannot be granted to them. Since accused

2, 3 and 6 are already arrested, prayer for anticipatory bail by them

is infructuous. Petitioners 4 and 5 are required for investigation.

BA.6516/08 2

Hence, petitioners 4 and 5 are directed to

surrender before the investigating officer and co-

operate with the investigation without any delay.

Whether they surrender or not, police is at

liberty to arrest them and proceed in accordance

with law.

With this direction, petition is dismissed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE
vgs.