High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Amit Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 October, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Amit Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 October, 2009
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                          AT CHANDIGARH


               Civil Writ Petition No.15617 of 2009 (O&M)
                    Date of decision: 13th October, 2009


Amit Jain
                                                                 ... Petitioner
                                   Versus
State of Haryana and others
                                                             ... Respondents


CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

Present:     Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with
             Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for the petitioner.

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL)

Civil Misc. No. 16830 of 2009

Application is allowed. The additional affidavit is taken on

record.

Civil Writ Petition No.15617 of 2009

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is engaged

in the business of mining and transport of sand, gravel and boulders from

the States of U.P. to Haryana. Learned counsel further submits that for the

reasons, which cannot be justified legally, trucks belonging to the

petitioner or his transporters are stopped and the movement of the goods

is restrained. Counsel submits that there is no legal provision, under which

the police officials could do so. Counsel further submits that even though

his representation (Annexure P-2) has not been addressed to the Senior

Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar, his grievance primarily is against

SHO, Police Station Khizrabad and his subordinate officials. Counsel

further submits that earlier, one of the persons Brij Pal Singh had filed Civil
Civil Writ Petition No.15617 of 2009 2

Writ Petition No. 563 of 2000 on the same cause and learned Additional

Advocate General, Haryana had made a statement that the movement of

the trucks shall not be restricted.

Issue notice of motion.

On the asking of Court, Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional

Advocate General Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Copy of

the petition has been handed over to him.

Present writ petition can be disposed of without going into the

contents of the case, as counsel for the petitioner submits that he will

submit a representation to Senior Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar

and confine his prayer to decision of his representation.

Counsel for the petitioner may file detailed representation to

the Senior Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar, detailing the facts and

the order passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 563 of 2000. In case such a

representation is filed, the same shall be decided by the Senior

Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar within two months, after receipt of

certified copy of this order.

With these observations, present petition is disposed of.

[KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA]
JUDGE
October 13, 2009
rps