High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Amit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Amit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2010
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Cr.Misc. No.26536 of 2010
               AMIT KUMAR S/O LATE RAJ KUMAR RAM
                                 Versus
                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                -----------

4. 05.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an

order dated 12.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 46409 of 2009

but it has been submitted that despite the charge having

been framed on 10.2.2010 till date despite service of

summons no witness has turned out.

Considering the same as also the petitioner is in

custody since 23.5.2009, let the petitioner above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the

satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Bihar

Sharif in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 136/2009,

subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a

close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit
2

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner

and the other bailor shall be the brother/father/mother of the

petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information

to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is

not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed

for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioner will

be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                                ( Anjana Prakash, J. )