High Court Karnataka High Court

Amjad Ali S/O. Imtiyaz vs State By D J Halli Police on 3 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Amjad Ali S/O. Imtiyaz vs State By D J Halli Police on 3 April, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
W- -... ,.,. ..m....m....   W nnucunlnnn mun cuuxr or mxmmm men cmm cm KARNATAKA HIGH CGURT m= mmmaxa 5150:; cc

:1:

IN Tim HIGH comm' or Kaawamm AT 

Damn tmzs was 3-'-"' ms.' or amt; 2.a¢9  5'; ~ 3

EWURE.'

rm HoN'3w m.JU.:-mics  

Crl . P . No.1 131226333
BEIWEEN:

mam ALI
s/o IMTIYAZ .   ;
Azania ABOUT 26  .
Rasznzzw--0? 
    "
D.J.gA:.L:;':j  * *

     V

. . . PETITIONER

 """  '=Tf¢Bi"[Sri'%!§"'K  ADV. ,)

'1'HE._$'.I'A:I' E  V. 
 B1r4_;n.J.HAL'L1HpoL1cE
-    ..... 

. 'REPRESEEIIED BY
   
  Rnsaommrr

 ~! (m1"' sun. A v amamaszxsmm, Hosp)

  'A-mxs '"c:R3:.P. 1911.29 U/S 439 '\rc_>c:arr1is FOR mm pmrrrxonmz PRAYING we swam
 r;;t;n'>.o'1'r BAIL IN c12.1~Io.3o9/zoos or ::a.J.HAx.I.I
-POLICE srmxou pkunxue on ya mm or mm x:

 1@;Y0 HALL, BANGRLORE FOR TE OFFEl%

 UNDER szmxoxs 324 12/w 34 or me.

THIS PETITION COMING OR FOR $03123 THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIKG:



>ua:uvo.ssuM"'vvhwc'% ecmiimwxtza mwrwssmu "twat rom~mmaa'wmm».wmm%am*a w£IH..7;";W %e..«%wM'W& wfif" ¥'%,é"'?k¢1&a'bz2;$*»>és§£'«'§r§3'ée.s%v>& ¥"'$£§%aW§'"§€ fiwki

ORE

The petitioner/accused No . 3_  «t   _»_ A4 
C.C.No.24".!.24/2009 on the file of 
cam, Bangalore is before 

Sedation 439 _Cr.P.C.,  

1~:o.3o9/2903 of n J sa111V'L'9§1:_g:e ' St_ua:tian} for

the offances p1mish.§§:SJ.e  307,

341 a 355 read with  sign 

2. Then t,;a¢V..pr¢§aas;cut1on is that
the presavnto.  corqblainant

wh:i.1e_   __'ai:cused.

3. ,- Loarneoh  .3-::é.=.>  submits that after
 gas  the 10 has laid Charge

shtéetg  aocused persons for the

 above  .~ef .

  Loarnect counsel for the petitioner
 that according to the prosecution the
  has sustained all s1@J.e injuries and

  alleged overtaot by the present petitioner

is not sufficient to hold that the prosecution

L.



" "" """'""'""''''"''" """*"'" """"'"'"W'" W" W"'m'*MWW%M WWW lwmwm "W" WM-%?"§3~W%W'%  arimw @553 Kfi.¥iNfi.QE"&%fi HHGM W

has made out a primawfacie case fox:-"gthe

offence under section 307 of IPC.

5. Keg:-ing in viewwthat '* 'V
petitioner held the   

injured persons    

sustained simple injurifeps-,:_ it véotiti mo; the
ends of justice  petitioner on

bail subjectto   V .

6.   the petition is
a11owa'd;' - :51:   is directed. to
release lthé "Jon bail subject to

fulfillment 2 of 'tho__ foi ttmg conditions: --

xi.)   petitioner shall exeeute a

 "po:'.~ooz:;1"'Vohond for a. sum of m.1o,oeo/--
 tfeir«$i__ tureties for the likesum to the
szttztsiaiaéizion of the trial Court;

  ithtt the petitioner shall deposit cash

fs'3oou;t;i.ty of R.s.10,000/- before tho trial

 " -Vcourt;

 iii) that the petitioner shall not tauper with

. the prosecution witnesses;



a .,..»A.m. 
1.

d _….s
S u’
m I
s .

M
.. o

.1
ya .

.c .w_.

w M

1
e W
m …

t
“M M
m c
\.I .3
.w_ a.

“V0 :9: §.§¢zu<x $9 .5509 £@_: dflfihflzug $9 MNDOU :§: <E§<zx<_x $3 333.) E33. itrzffidig L} inc… E.:{;.r…E.E..; 5… 3…! :1: