High Court Karnataka High Court

Ammar Primary And High School vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 2 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Ammar Primary And High School vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 2 September, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
...w-..-.- -«ao'IIu'wwtsI1tI'z wru-

um---am: vurwur-uu-n mnsvuual  WK' Wflinlflffllflflfifl 9"'fiH~¢?§"'3 WWMKI VIN" mnflammiflfifl 311$?" QWWKH gut'?       '

akin

II 'II! II& 6113'!!!' 0!' fillflflll. H' 

narrzsra mm mm 2" BA: or ssmmmnk, 2009jff~. -g_

BEFORE

THE Horzmns 2-m.a'tIs:1-Icx s.£-.3313; rm-s:«% "

in-u:'.r snwxzrzcm 1~ro.s'r2e ar;41.2o:§sA~ ':{E:1I!N_°i_    

I
SET'

mm mm! :. rum  
tnzcamzzxn 81' Tim     , 
savzmamxw oz' MRMTAKMA =  L ' '
rmrme ITS orrxcs AT -   j 
no . zsafa, nsmmmss  .'  
1:s.J.:im:.L1, nm:s2azg:nE+=§5:  % _ ._ 
amp. 3! ms %   rmmimam
[By  Vkazrfazfi. " 

1 swmz "cog 
any.' 3'! 13:3 ascnmrnnx
1:z.=.«:;3Am1m~:T'csf BDUGATIOH
 
A :'B '*560 001

5 ~. fiat-IE  or mama
z.:4s'rImc_$;o:¢, K.R.C-IRCLE
BA.wfG.a;o:13~56c 001

K V}    * am it-spam nxrmcma or

 'VEUELIC zmsmucnme

z3A1~r<';.amnx mam

arms: or Jam DIRECTOR mam
x.a.1mm,nmmz.om:-use om .. nmmam

{By Sri B. MANOHAR, AHA)



THIS HQIT PETITIG IS FILED ENDER AREICLE

225 mm 227 or 'rm cmcsrxmrxon or 
PRAYIHG we atlas:-I mmzxtmn 9 125863!) at '1mx_3.-3_ 

M'. 11.1.2008 arm nzcmnn 'rs-rat' trim 
muss' or THE swan sow. mszmacma  
or msmmmon As Iamcam on NATIVE '  K 
'03 BE ULTRA was THE corIs'1*:'1'L:frIms
ox ms: rmxrxmcan.      
tms wax-zc 1:19;':-It-3::a§trT1%c:::_1~1:I:»s:x'.=;"'L--'i;éz-z "' ran ORDERS
arms my, :1-m seam: pussy}:  .i?DLI.;§2fi_ifEl¢G:
I ha_41m; fiounael fer the

partias .

2. In this AV.c;au:V'a;"  AAp;a:Vt";i";»LV1:ior:or has
sought fc:r  7a:;., ;ié;i&::§.1t§.A9n  1':1ti;&i:  the language
palicy  at "v4é'.lVfu.V*:;:v§rV:'a_;..'c:~3.-::z::::a::¢:.f: making tho
medium  Kannada ox: native

J.~angnagw*'«T:T§$V'«.i§l.t:a -.+::.:¢.a at the constitution or

 mandarnus directing the

'""'*'" " A'*V-*'*'..'A""'""' ""' """"""'"'""'~"*' WW?! Mvum ur RANNAWAKR I-mm CUURT of mammmm Mam»; mmm" OF WEN-ATflm HEQH 4

fespafféfioniifififilgérities ta acaord permission to

n aw-mm: war-nlr-\u:\:I'-1

in



the pstitioner~school to ingart education in

English medium.

3. The petitionerfischeol had made an*T2i

application to the second respondent to ac¢brds"t"

permission to start English medium schosl, The ‘7VH

said application has been retfitnefli b9, the “i

second respondent. as per ‘thei*sndotsement 7st”‘s

Rnnexure ‘D’ dated ii.–1.i..20os'” –.F§;1$””-t_he a<:E3;m:;ui'i:<:i

that such a permission ;is"»ndt_ips:missible

having regérdUta'ths"léh§uage pelicy of the
St ate Gove rnmsriti . _

'V"4. Vfiéarned Cofinsél for the petitioner

wou1&_'sQn:sng¥ that the said endorsement is

{iéontrary to,ths Full Bench decision of this

in ths__A'3~case of ASEOCIAIED s or.

maomanr SCHOOLS IN' zcanzvzmrca vs.

'' or KARNATAICA, BY ms smmrmr,

or mmrzoy 5 crime —– ILR 2008

rciuz 2995. 5

W

P-