Amresh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar &Ors on 7 July, 2011

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CWJC No.4231 of 2008
                  AMRESH KUMAR, S/O SRI RAMASHRAYA YADAV, R/O
                  VILLAGE AND P.O.-PATELIYA, P.S.-BIBHUTIPUR,
                  DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.       ...............PETITIONER.
                                       Versus
                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DISTRICT
                  MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR.
                  2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR.
                  3. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                  SAMASTIPUR.
                  4. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,
                  BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                  5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIBHUTIPUR,
                  DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                  6. SANJAY KUMAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAIN MAHTO,
                  R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.-PATELIYA, P.S.-
                  BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                  7. MUKHIYA, PATELIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT,
                  DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                  8. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PATELIYA GRAM
                  PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                  9. SUKH SUVIDHA SAMITI THROUGH MUKHIYA,
                  PATELIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR.
                                               ...............RESPONDENTS.
                                -----------

3 07.07.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the

appointment of respondent no.6 as Shiksha

Mitra.

From Annexure-5 series, it appears

that the petitioner has been making complaint

against non-consideration of his case inspite

of having higher marks than the respondent

no.6.

In the circumstances, the writ

application is disposed of with liberty to the

petitioner to file his complaint/appeal before

the concerned statutory Appellate Authority
2

constituted under the Rules. If he does so

within one month, the Appellate Authority

shall issue notice to respondent no.6 and

other necessary parties, hear them and decide

the matter preferably within a period of two

months from the date of receipt/production of

a copy of this order.

Arvind/                             ( J. N. Singh, J.)