High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Amrik Singh vs State Of Punjab on 16 September, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Amrik Singh vs State Of Punjab on 16 September, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH




                         Criminal Misc. No. M-16543 of 2008
                         Date of decision : September 16, 2009


Amrik Singh
                                           ....Petitioner
                         versus

State of Punjab
                                           ....Respondent


Coram:      Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal


Present :   Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner

            Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab


L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)

Convict Amrik Singh sent application from jail addressed to

Hon’ble the Chief Justice of this Court, which has been treated as petition

under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( in short, Cr.P.C.).

The petitioner has alleged that he is convict in two cases i.e. FIR No. 110

dated 8.5.2001, under sections 302, 392 IPC and section 25 of Arms Act,

Police Station Fazilka, District Ferozepur, in which he has preferred

Criminal Appeal No. 645-DB of 2004 and FIR No. 54 dated 16.8.2001,

under sections 302, 307, 392 IPC and section 25 of the Arms Act, Police

Station City Jalalabad (W), District Ferozepur, in which he has preferred

Criminal Appeal No. 553 of 2007 (correct number being 853-DB of 2007 as

per report of office). The petitioner-convict has prayed that sentences

awarded to him in the aforesaid cases be ordered to run concurrently.
Criminal Misc. No. M-16543 of 2008 -2-

As per office report, both the aforesaid appeals are still pending

in this Court.

In view of judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the case of

Jang Singh versus State of Punjab, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal), 323, the

instant separate petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable for

seeking direction for concurrent running of sentences awarded in two or

more cases although such prayer can be made in the pending appeal or

revision.

In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of with

liberty to convict-petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with

law, in the pending appeals.

A copy of this order be sent to the convict-petitioner through

jail authorities.



                                                        ( L.N. Mittal )
September 16, 2009                                           Judge
  'dalbir'