Anant vs Sayad Basheroddin on 5 January, 2009

V. .-- 'nub! ur-uruwru I uvl I \u\IIJ'lII \Jl" l\lQK£'II'\I.i'\I\F' I1"J'I"'I LUUIG    

W.P.No.902/ 2007
.. 1 -
in was man comer or mnnarmm
CIRCUIT nmacu AT eunsmm

DATED was 1-33 578 95? or   5»    

BEFORE 4 1 _ _
'mm HOWBLE MR. Juana;   
war. xgfigw V.  M V
BETWEEN: 1' % %    .
Anant S/0 Rai Kishan Rao    V}
Aged about 35 y!°:a1S,~.   .  3 
Gcc: Legal Praciit:ioE*.€:;',"_'-- V

R/oKhajuri,   ;;  . U   if. V
Tq: Aiand, Bist:     ...PE'I"ITiONER

(By Sn' Ameet  iiiaeshggandg; 'Axiv;'j

AND:

Sayad Ba.-zhcmdding %s;v¢ saye;i'Fa1andd1n,

'Age: 60.§;«f:ars, Ocsc: Business,
 R/'n of indie praying to quash the order dated

13, passed by the hamed Prl. Civii Judge (Jr.Dn.)

 .&".}M39'C, Aiand, in 0.S.No.18/2005, whereby it is ordered

 V j  the agreement for sale executed by the plaintiff

  favour of ticfcndant to collect the stamp duty and

 " 'penalty, the certified copy of which order is filed and
 marked as A;ux~D.



V:-Fl nHlu'IHiI~\I'uF\ HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF  COUE

. w-nriurlii

W. P. No.902/ 2007
-}

This Writ Petition, coming on for hearing, 

the Court made the following:

ORDER

This Writ petition by the 4′ V

agam st an interlocutory ordef

(Annexure—D) passed by the -.~__
the Principal Civil Judge, (Jr… in
O.S.No.18/2005. By the trial
court has ifl1p0§§1fififi “sale dated
16.8.2001 in favour of the
defendant, it to the District

Regstrap;.._£}u1’baeéa’:’j’t,e:NV deficit stamp duty

and penalty

‘he.v’efheer_d the learned counsel appearing for

the impugned order at

n__ nexAv.1:!e~I§}.’ ‘

” counsel appearing for the petitioner
that the ageement referred to above is

4: .e§§empted from payment of any duty in View of

My