High Court Karnataka High Court

Anbu S/O Mohanraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Anbu S/O Mohanraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 September, 2010
Author: V.G.Sabhahit And K.Govindarajulu
IN THE HIGK COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 9"! DAY 05' SEPTEMBER. 2o'1t)j;--f- 

: PRESENT :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUs'rIc1«::_ v..,_c;.   

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUsTi'¢E 

W.P. HC. No.159 DF'_ 2910." «-
Between: V 'V & h .

Anbu.   '
S/0. Moh_ar=.«._aj',. e 1. 
Aged about 4513' Years,   j. V
R/at I\-:Io.1f3---, 1- vP;..__0 BI_o_ck,.__ 'g "
MaI'ikupp21m;, '   «. 
  Kolaf *§E}i«sti"1'.c;t..

 Petitioner

(By Sri Y.' R_."sadasiv;;' I2¢'dd"y+'{6r Y.R. Sadasiva Raddy &
Associates) _V V 7 b n 

 , 'And;'

1. V  VSte1te of Karnataka
' .  -.RevpfBy.IfsSecretary,
  offlame Affairs,
Q "=Vid1'ia1'1:a Soudha,
__E3anga_1c$.re-560 O0 1 .

 '  .   2 Sixperintendent of Poiice

 "  G. F. District.
= 131.0. F.



3 The Circle Inspector of Police
Marikuppain,
K. G. F.

4 The Sub Inspector of Police
Marikuppam Police Station,
K. G. F.

5 Bhaktavatsalarn
S/o. Murugesh,
Aged about 60 Years.
EX«~President.  '
City Municipal Council,
K .G. F, R/at 5th Cross,
Robertsonpet, 
K .G .F'.

6 Vijaya V   V
Aged about 'Yeérsfi  " _  
Counoillofi     »

City 1\/iu11ic,ipa1?.4Coune_i1,
Rriat---.Aridhmi"ianr:,'*-._ ---- '
Opp: Champion. " _ " 
Rail\5siay"S_ta on  F.
7 gshakeelal " V
   .... 

, Aged o.bo.ut 40 Years,
V _ ‘”cou’m:i11m-;–..

” ;CityV”_Municipal Council,
Rfiat Aéhaya Colony,
Qpp: R. R College,

n Marikuppam, K. G. F.

…Respondents

. Sri.E.S. Inderesh, Government Pleader for R1 to R4;

” Sri. A.K. Subbaiah, Advocate for R5)

This W.P.H.C. is flied under Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constitution of India, praydrig to direct the respondents
to produce Smt. Shanthi wife of the petitioner bEfO1’f€”.T£h’$

Horfble Court forthwith and such protection to re1e_ase’*her”-.
without any bond or surety and award the grist _

proceedings.

This W.P.¥i.C. coming on jfof”‘O1fd’;z;rs,’:thisdayf,’ V

SABHAHIT J ., made the following: V
o R BVV’E!VzR

Counsei appearing for that
the detenue has and he does
not press the petitionnfi V . i V V.

2. the house, the

contenti-sn _of,.’i1.1′:’ega_1 –eletenti-on_.»~:does not survive for

Consideration and “aeeo1’ti’ing1y,”the’ writ petition is

dismissed as withdre;vx{n.. ‘ ._ ‘

Sd/is
s W Iuogé

sa
Eségs