High Court Kerala High Court

Anish vs State Of Kerala on 23 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
Anish vs State Of Kerala on 23 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4354 of 2010()


1. ANISH S/O.PARVATHY VELLATTU VEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.PREMCHAND

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :23/07/2010

 O R D E R
                              K. HEMA, J
                           ----------------------
                       B.A.No.4354 OF 2010
                    -----------------------------------
             Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2010


                               O R D E R

This petition is for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under sections 143, 147, 148,

341, 323, 324, 307 r/w 149 IPC. According to prosecution on

16.5.2010 petitioner (A6) along with five others formed

themselves into unlawful assembly and assaulted defacto

complainant by using dangerous weapons. The motive is political

rivalry between workers of B.J.P and I.U.M.L in connection with

elopement of a muslim girl with petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner

is in custody since 18.6.2010 for the past 36 days. Co-accused

are granted bail. In this circumstances, learned public prosecutor

submitted that this bail application is not opposed.

4. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be

granted on conditions. Hence the following order is passed:

Petitioner shall be released on bail on his

executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent

B.A. No.4354/10 2

sureties each for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, on

following conditions:

1) Petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer on every Monday and
Thursday between 10 AM and 1 PM.

2) Petitioner shall not enter the limits of police
station within which crime is registered,
except for compliance of condition no.1.

3) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate
the witnesses or tamper with evidence.

4) In case petitioner is involved in other crime
of similar nature, the bail is liable to be
cancelled.

This petition is allowed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE.

Sou.