Posted On by &filed under High Court, Patna High Court - Orders.


Patna High Court – Orders
Anita Singh & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 13 October, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30634 of 2011
              1.   Anita Singh, W/o Ranjit Kumar Singh alias Ranjit
                   Singh.
              2.   Ranjit Kumar Singh alias Ranjit Singh, S/o Sri
                   Molendra Narayan Singh.
              3.   Kunal Kumar alias Kunal Kumar Singh, S/o Ranjit
                   Kumar Singh.
              4.   Dhirendra Prasad Kumar alias Dhirendra Kumar
                   Singh, S/o Sri Ramdeo Prasad Kumar.
                                          Versus
                                    The State of Bihar
                                      -----------------

02. 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504

and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that now the matter has been

compromised between the parties, let the petitioners,

above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event

of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of

the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each

or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in

connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 219 of 2010

(G.R. No. 891/10) subject to the conditions as laid down

under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of
2

the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who

will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake

to inform the Court if there is any change in the address

of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state

that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case

and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That

the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in

any other case of similar nature after their release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if

they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well

represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two

consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.123 seconds.