Annappa Lumanna Kunnurakar vs The Gram Panchayat on 27 May, 2009

in ms HIGH COURT 0;? KARNATAKA.  j

CIRCUIT BENCH AT' DfiARWAD__=   '  '" V' '

DATED THIS TI-IE zvffi DAYAQF MAY,'  ~ _  u

3Ei:*Rn:§=.__

THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE; _Aszio_1§'.3, 1»:i'1§%c::-x'1,<V3Eiz: V%

W..P.He. 62596($;0%21::94_w_(§}ll!;(3i';f_3]'  fg

BE"§"i?3!EE§\¥:

E .

gx}

*":--';-2:..v as 1313*? B'3LQs},:;.M

ANNAPPA LUMANNA KUNI§U:éAi§AR.~~A..v[V"  '
AGED ABOiE'i_"f£y6_ YEARS" --  "  1

GANAN?A.'§'--.:v Li§§;§A.NNA i§AfzNL1.f?§.:{A§? ' 
AGED A.:'BOL¥'i'. ff;<5'¥.EARF._§,.__  _ ' 

m&:A an. M  '1;A:a::r.»:;£.'1=';i KU:§3:»z."£,; £2z%}{AR
mas) ABOUT an "':'jE23.EE§--- 

ALL R;" TEES
ORDER' PASSED ON I.A.NO, 2 BY T§{E3 IST ADDL.CIVfL 

BN3 BELGAUM ON O.S,NO. '?'58/2008 DATED 

PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A.  

'mm PETITION comma _efm__ FAVI':s3A:2Y' 

HEARING, miss DAY, THE comm' 2»-;ADm'Hs"::_ F~:DLLO3§£§NGV: 
oRDER.f°  - * *

The }3€ti'ti0i1(',I'S have 'fif.'}f

pI’Od13€3€ any documents with its Written sta£e’i:a.{i:n;?;_[‘~.iL’héM V’

No.2 had to be filed. He submits in b

I.A.No’2 are necessaxy for the ad§udir;afion _;sf’ ~t}::.eV’iSs1,iésu

involved it: the suit,

5. The sum and $I’;1i3.$ta1:§.{:é”fi}icafi0n is prima facie prfimaturfi. Further, it is

aisc: ‘é;geVi:.Vt§:V ‘the gwztiticnfirs to avail the informafjgni decuments

13$? ‘i3:;s.’§:ckV§’ng the reisvant pI’0ViSi{):{1S of the Right ta Infermatien

— “It is also apex: 1:0 the gcetiiicners ta make apprspriate

” “fi:ppli<:atio11 at appmpriate stage far the production «cf

dncuments by the respendents, 73' need be. Subject is these