High Court Kerala High Court

Ansad vs Gunasekharan @ Kannan on 4 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ansad vs Gunasekharan @ Kannan on 4 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1238 of 2004()


1. ANSAD S/O. ISMAIL, PUTHUPPARAMBIL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. GUNASEKHARAN @ KANNAN
                       ...       Respondent

2. G.R.SHAJI S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, GREE VILASAM

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., KOTTAYAM

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.K.SUNIL

                For Respondent  :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :04/07/2008

 O R D E R
                            M.N.KRISHNAN, J
                       =====================
                         MACA No.1238 OF 2004
                       =====================

                  Dated this the 4th day of July 2008

                               JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the award of th Motor Accidents

Claims Tribunal, Kottayam in O.P.(MV)No.1142 of 1996. The claimant

when he was aged about 8 years in the year 1985 sustained injury in a road

accident and filed the claim petition in the year 1996. The Tribunal

awarded him a compensation of Rs.12,000/- and dissatisfied with the same

he has come up in appeal.

2. A perusal of the discharge card and the certificate issued by the

Medical College Hospital, Kottayam would show that he was treated as an

inpatient from 28.8.1985 to 23.9.1985. He had undergone emergency

operation for the depressed fracture of the skull on the right parietal region

and there was some weakness on the left side. Except this document, there

is nothing else to prove that the boy had gone for further treatment after

1985 so as to hold that the boy had sustained some disability. The boy had

not gone for further treatment after 1985 At the time of discharge the boy

was able to walk with support but there was unsteadiness of the gait. When

MACA 1238/2004 -:2:-

he was examined in 2004, the boy would say that he is having head ache.

The Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering and

granted an amount of Rs.1,500/- for treatment expenses though no bill has

been produced. The boy aged 8 years on account of the depressed fracture

of the skull would not have been able to play and enjoy. Therefore I grant

Rs.3,000/- towards loss of enjoyment in life. Therefore the claimant will be

entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.3,000/-.

Therefore MACA is partly allowed and the claimant is entitled to an

additional compensation of Rs.3,000/- with 6% interest on the said sum

from the date of petition till realisation and the insurance company is

directed to deposit the amount within 60 days from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE

Cdp/-