Antony Joe Kingsley Fernandez vs M.R.Unni (Father’S Name And Age on 4 March, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con.Case(C).No. 155 of 2010(S)


1. ANTONY JOE KINGSLEY FERNANDEZ,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M.R.UNNI (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE
                       ...       Respondent

2. RAJAN GURUKKAL (FATHER'S NAME AND

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :04/03/2010

 O R D E R
                        P.R. RAMAN, Ag. C.J. &
                  C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                  --------------------------------------------
                 Cont. of Court Case No. 155 OF 2010
                  --------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010

                               JUDGMENT

Raman, Ag. C. J.

This Contempt Petition is filed alleging non-compliance of

Annexure A judgment. As per Annexure A judgment, after setting

aside the order passed by the Vice Chancellor, the University was

directed to pass appropriate orders and left open all the contentions

raised by the appellant in the Writ Appeal. The complaint of the

petitioner is that University has not passed orders. Standing counsel

appearing for the University has produced before us the fax message

received from the University informing that decision has been taken by

the University and the decision is to the following effect:

The University is willing to honour the sale deed by paying
the balance consideration, i.e., Rs. 50 lakhs only to be paid
as agreed earlier. As there is no legal heir proved beyond
doubt by a competent court, the amount can be entrusted to
the State if order to that effect is issued by the Court. The
delay in this case was on account of factors beyond the
control of the University. The rival claimants including the

C0C 155/2010 2

petitioner in the contempt case are not prepared to produce
the order of the court to substantiate their claim of rightful
heirship to the estate of the deceased, Fr. Cyriack
Puthenpura.

Standing counsel submitted that copy of the order will be served by the

respondent on the petitioner within two weeks from today. In the

above circumstances, Contempt case is closed.

(P.R. RAMAN)
Ag. Chief Justice

(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.

kk

C0C 155/2010    3