High Court Kerala High Court

Antony Leo vs State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Antony Leo vs State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14055 of 2009(B)


1. ANTONY LEO, AGED 64,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI

3. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

4. THE SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER,

5. K.K.CHERIAN, AGED 80, PROPRIETOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.ANAND, SC, COCHIN CORPN.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :29/05/2009

 O R D E R
               THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J
                  ...........................................
                 WP(C).NO. 14055                 OF 2009
                  ............................................
          DATED THIS THE           29TH DAY OF MAY, 2009

                                JUDGMENT

Government Pleader takes notice for first respondent.

Standing counsel takes notice for second, third and fourth

respondents. Notice to fifth respondent is dispensed with

preserving his right to move for review of this judgment, if

aggrieved.

2. The petitioner, through Ext.P1(a) has shown that Ext.P1

has been delivered in the office of the first respondent in

January/February, 2009. The complaint therein is regarding the

alleged pollution by an activity done by the fifth respondent.

Without expressing anything on merits, this writ petition is

ordered directing that Ext.P1 will be taken up, considered and

disposed of by the fifth respondent, in accordance with law, at

the earliest, at any rate, within a period of two months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, so that any person

aggrieved by that decision, would be entitled to seek further

statutory relief in that regard. The fourth respondent would also

WP(C) 14055/2009 2

do the needful on any complaint obtained from the petitioner in

relation to the allegations in Ext.P1.

THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE

lgk/30/5