High Court Kerala High Court

Antony T.O. vs State Of Kerala on 25 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
Antony T.O. vs State Of Kerala on 25 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4052 of 2003()


1. ANTONY T.O., AGED 50 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. PRADEEP KUMAR, AGED 32 YEARS,

3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.X.VARGHESE

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :25/03/2008

 O R D E R
                            A.K.BASHEER, J.
           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      Crl.M.C.No.4052 OF 2003
           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
             Dated this the 25th day of March 2008

                                    ORDER

In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, petitioner who is the complainant in a

prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act takes exception to the inaction of respondents 3 and 4 in

executing the non-bailable warrant issued by the trial court

against respondent no.2/accused.

2. The grievance of the petitioner appeared to be that

respondents 3 and 4 had not been taking effective steps to

apprehend and produce the accused before the court in spite

of pendency of non-bailable warrant issued by the court.

Learned Government Pleader, after getting instruction,

submits that respondent No.2/accused had been arrested and

produced before the court on January 30, 2004. In that view

of the matter, no further orders are necessary in this Criminal

M.C.

Crl.M.C.No.4052 OF 2003
:: 2 ::

3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the accused had again jumped bail and he is still at large.

The further grievance is that Police officers are yet again

guilty of laches in as much as the accused has not been

apprehended so far.

4. It will be open to the petitioner to pursue the matter

before the trial court. I do not find any reason why the

learned Magistrate shall not issue appropriate orders to

ensure that non-bailable warrant, if any, issued against the

accused is executed promptly.

Criminal M.C. is closed.

(A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE)
jes

Crl.M.C.No.4052 OF 2003
:: 3 ::

A.K.BASHEER, J.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Crl.M.C.No.4052 OF 2003

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

ORDER

Dated 25th March 2008