EN ‘mg: HIGH CGEWIRT 0}? §<:ARE\§A'£Zf%.E'9 S.E3PfFEEf.?s}1f :§§s:§§é;I;: 2a§§$’% u .
gEF&§$
THE HQNBLE MR, 1,::J.;§;fr:{:§:% %–s§§::::’é%;:g%;zg Rgéé ” .
ed. A. r:a§V’9.#i:: pf émfij %
Beiween:
Sm: gmugwmmm
wig BJVE. RA._!.é,NN£ ..
AGEE} mom’ 35 Yams _
R;0.yER§AG9;~;fifE’=;:L:,A;G§ , .4
mggag HsBLE:s£??%>rgL%;¥:<;% " _
TUMKUR 1:513'? sf ~ A .
V ;–,TgP9§:;L,a..:a_m
{By SR: 3 R ;g:”%£;3:»££§{A§<:;;:{A.R;';aV':3v ,;"
2 gm 1% :::AJ;z§$r;ag;'
s;Q. me. lk§AL{;:%I2%.E~E
AGE;;Z'sg%E:5G{}T~4G'3'P;§«;E'S
SE2: 5: N M;a£.,;A:m;
~ g.,1a.V.%N.aRAsEc;::;2;znA
A£;é§:%} 3,393? 55 ygggg
~ -R/1¥E”‘3HA§§’i’ARAf€&LLI mgmag
– $;;=;;>£::2;;2»m_.;.L: ms?
. Eé;’§Sz%§A~B€3BLI, ?z;1§A§I>§§UG1RI zmuza
1=z;:~;i:<:uH'a1s':*
ix?»
3 $;§g'r."§§A§asAMM;a
"WfO. 8.164' mamzga
AGES mom as YEARS
V' ' * __ SR: mggzmgaumswamy
Sgo, arm MALLAIAH
mm A302}? 35 YEARS
V SR? B M MAHENDRA
sgo. RN, MA.LLAIéH
AGES ABOUT 33 '£'E:%RS
6%/
€'.3\
§<;§a¥I"I"§iA
:;;@.R5NGAPRz:
AGEE ABOUT’ :22 YEARS
AL; gag RESEDENG A’? B§§AKTARAH;s.L:,:fjvvf:fiLA<;§;–. = "
aI..mE;Rm§ALL: 9:333' " ..
KASABA E-{GEL-E, zs£,.AaHu<;$.%§z: T.a.§..u§:
TUMKUR DES'? =
' '- — R§«:sP§.;:%;§)E:sTs
{By SR3 §~§ as 2593.133, .a§sPE:LLm~:’:’ PRAYING T§§§AT_’?§’£§S H©§:*§3L:<:..g:QL:H§ my 33 PLE:-§a$%';D
'50 SE'? Aging *;*;«:*g. (233319 P;%$SED E«3'f–'?HE- 2:53:23. (3.5 {«JQ,DE*¥} 55 t}}*:'€§'?Cg,
MAQHUGIRI, ,:N'«.._cj;c.:s:c3.4a;2,£e*o '*AC'§«*1f=g1\’:<:*5: PfLi;S–,138 <3? ram. Ac'? Afflfi U;'S4é98~fi;.
494, 4-94 3,5,}; 3' 1.4; V " '
,C:}1_§1§IfVEg"GiE..fCf* .z%dm£Ssian, this dag; §%"i€i'–
Gaurft ::ieIii?:t::;1.:*::'d;& the fglhwing
fg§§GMEKT
acc'{ise–:..3—«" are prosecuted fer cammitting the
' §'L{I:1i'$hab1€ under Sectizm 498-«A, 4943 axis} 113;
. {caused ape piusecuted by way' of a §r%1;:2.~*:t€
con2§~1%ai::1t. The appefiant (wife-;) is the campiajnant
' ' afléging the acts of cruelty on ma par: of the accuséd and
Vfhe bigamous marriage 01' A 1 with A 6, dm*i:1_g {ha ssaiéd
subsistence of the marriage 01° A»: with the compiaiziani
who was exarnined as PW 1, The trial Caurt has fazmé
CL//M
that the marriage of A 1 with A 6 is not prex§e<i 'te be
performed in accordance with the religioééie' ' fie
constitute valid legal marriage.
it is stated that the evidence V'<)f }'?'\«"..Z 3 1"ee::1ehe '
testimony and there is no eoizzfpboratien. PW
who have testified the ~:__oi7 hearsay
witnesses, parents -she had confirieci
about the acf:s_:'of_ ertgeltje the case of
the cf the facts
and given by the txial
Cou1't:: fQr'– and proper. Accordingly the
appeal 9' '
Sd/~
Iudge