High Court Kerala High Court

Anwar Basha vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 3 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Anwar Basha vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 3 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14011 of 2009(V)


1. ANWAR BASHA, AGED 38 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. S.MURUGESAN, AGED 4O YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD.

3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :03/06/2009

 O R D E R
                          V.GIRI, J.
              ---------------------------
                   W.P.(C).14011 of 2009
              ---------------------------
          Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2009

                         JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a trader in Foodgrains. According

to him, though he has applied for a licence under the Kerala

Foodgrain Dealers’ Licensing Order, 1967, the application is

pending. A consignment of 150 quintals of rice stated to be

purchased by him from a dealer in Palakkad was transported in

a vehicle belonging to the second petitioner, who is stated to

have a valid inter state permit. The consignment was seized by

the 3rd respondent apparently on the premise that the

transportation is without authority. Hence this writ petition

seeking a direction for release of the lorry along with the goods.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits that the vehicle along with the goods have been

produced before the District Collector and infraction of the

Rationing Order and Essential Commodities Act is suspected.

3. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Government Pleader.

W.P.(C).14011 of 2009

:: 2 ::

4. The District Collector is competent to take a

decision on the release of goods and the vehicle. The District

Collector is empowered under Section 6 A of the Essential

Commodities Act to take a decision.

5. In the result, if the petitioner moves the 2nd

respondent District Collector, he shall consider the petitioner’s

request for release of the goods as also the vehicle, within one

month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Before taking a decision by the District Collector, he shall give an

opportunity to the petitioner to show cause. On requisition

made by the petitioner, a copy of the seizure mahazar as also

the show cause notice, specifying the grounds on which the

goods and vehicle are proposed to be retained, are to be given to

the petitioner.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
Judge
sk/
//true copy//

P.S. to Judge