Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Appearance vs Mr Hl Jani Addl. Public Prosecutor … on 4 August, 2010
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8458/2010	 2/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8458 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SANJAY
MURSHANKARBHAI PUROHIT 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT 

 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
BN LIMBACHIA for
Applicant 
MR HL JANI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 04/08/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

This
application is filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure by the applicant who has been arrested in connection with
C.R. No. II – 3149 of 2009 registered with Ishanpur Police Station,
Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under sections 3, 5, 6 and 7 of
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.

Mr.N. D.

Nanavati, learned senior advocate for Mr.B. N. Limbachiya, learned
advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant is an
innocent person and a false case is foisted on him. He submitted that
considering the role attributed to the applicant and reflected in the
FIR at Annexure ‘A’ to the application, this is a fit case to enlarge
the applicant on regular bail.

As against
the aforesaid, learned APP Mr.H. L. Jani submitted that considering
the role played by the applicant, no discretionary relief can be
granted to the applicant, and the application deserves to be
dismissed.

Having
heard the rival submissions of learned advocates and having
considered the role attributed to the applicant and reflected in the
FIR at Annexure A, the quantum of punishment etc. and gravity of
offence, I am of the view that the the applicant is required to be
enlarged on regular bail at this stage on stringent conditions,
without entering into the merits of the case and without discussing
the evidence in detail.

The
parties do not press for further reasoned order.

In the
facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and
the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection with
C.R. No. II – 3149 of 2009 registered with Ishanpur Police Station,
Ahmedabad, on his executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten
thousand only] with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction
of the trial court and subject to the conditions that he shall:

[a] not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;

[b]. not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c]. surrender
his passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d]. not
leave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the
Sessions court concerned;

[e]. furnish
the present address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the
Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his
residence without prior permission of this Court;

[f]. maintain
law and order.

If breach
of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge
concerned will be free to issue warrant or to take appropriate action
in the matter.

Bail bond
to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the
case.

At the
trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of
preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this
Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted.

(Z.K.SAIYED,
J.)

(vijay)

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

103 queries in 0.223 seconds.