Gujarat High Court High Court

Appearance : vs Mr Hl Jani App For on 27 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Appearance : vs Mr Hl Jani App For on 27 September, 2010
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/1739/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1739 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================


 

DINESHBHAI
GANPATBHAI VAGHELA 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & ORS
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
HEMAL A DAVE for
Applicant 
MR HL JANI APP for Respondent No. 1 
NOTICE SERVED BY
DS for Respondent No. 2 
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent Nos. 3
- 4. 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/09/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

1 At
the time of admission hearing of this application, Mr. H.L. Jani,
learned APP for the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat
states that pursuant to filing of the FIR before the Sarkhej Police
Station, registered vide CR No. 194 of 2010, for the offences
punishable under Sections 363 and 366 read with Section 114 of the
Indian Penal Code against respondent Nos. 3 and 4, investigation
has been carried out and during the course of investigation, both of
them have been arrested. However, the respondent No.3 has been
enlarged on regular bail by this Court. So far as the respondent No.4
is concerned, police has sought for remand but no information has
been received from him with regard to the missing corpus –
Ravina, who is minor i.e. 16 years and 10 months old. The
respondent No.4 is at present in judicial custody and the
investigation is under progress. As and when the corpus –
Ravina is traced out, she will be produced before this Court. He
states that some more time is required to trace out the corpus and
prays to adjourn the matter for a period of four weeks.

2 The
prayer made by him has not been opposed by Mr. Hemal A. Dave,
learned Advocate for the petitioner.

3 Hence,
by consent of the learned Advocates, the matter is adjourned to
25.10.2010.

4 The
progress report of investigation submitted by Mr. Jani, learned APP,
shall be retained on the record of the case.

(A.M.KAPADIA,
J.)

(J.C.UPADHYAYA,
J.)

pnnai

   

Top