Gujarat High Court High Court

==========================================Appearance vs Mr Kiran R Jani For on 8 August, 2008

Gujarat High Court
==========================================Appearance vs Mr Kiran R Jani For on 8 August, 2008
Author: Bhagwati Prasad,&Nbsp;Honourable S.R.Brahmbhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/786/1995	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 786 of 1995
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
 
==========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

==========================================
 

UNION
OF INDIA 

 

Versus
 

MAHENDRAKUMAR
HARGOVANDAS PATEL AND OTHERS 

 

==========================================Appearance
: 
MR HARIN P
RAVAL for the Appellant  
MR KIRAN R JANI for
Respondent No.1  
RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 -
4. 
==========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/08/2008 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD)

1. Respondent
No.1 Mr. Mahendrakumar Hargovandas Patel was detained under Section
3(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of
Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 on 19.5.1994, which detention was
quashed by the learned Single Judge of this Court (Coram: R.K. Vyas,
J.) on 10th May, 1995 (judgment on 15th June,
1995) in Special Civil Application No.3849 of 1995 (converted from
Special Criminal Application No.862 of 1994).

2. Both
advocates have stated that since the period of detention is over and
the respondent has undergone the period of approximately 11 months
and 21 days, under these circumstances, the Letters Patent Appeal has
become infructuous. We do not think that any interference at this
stage is called for. Accordingly, we dismiss the Letters Patent
Appeal with no order as to costs.

(BHAGWATI
PRASAD, J.)

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

omkar

   

Top