Gujarat High Court High Court

Appearance : vs Mrkjpanchal For Applicant(S) : on 3 February, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Appearance : vs Mrkjpanchal For Applicant(S) : on 3 February, 2011
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/908/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 908 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 375 of 2006
 

=========================================


 

SANJAY
JIBAVABHAI RANA 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 

 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JM PANCHAL for Applicant(s) : 1,MS SADHANA SAGAR for Applicant(s) :
1,MRKJPANCHAL for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR. L.B.DABHI, APP for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
========================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 03/02/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

RULE.

Mr.

L.B.Dabhi, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule
on behalf of the Respondent – State of Gujarat.

Having
regard to the facts of the case, the Application is taken up for
hearing today.

By
filing instant Application, the Applicant – accused has prayed for
suspension of sentence and to release him on Regular Bail during the
pendency and final hearing of the above numbered Criminal Appeal.
Alternatively, it is also prayed to to list the above numbered
Criminal Appeal on final hearing
board.

At the
time of hearing of this Application, Ms. Sadhana Sagar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant – accused does not press this
Application so far as it relates to the prayer for suspension of
sentence and to release the Applicant – accused on regular
bail during the pendency and final hearing of the above numbered
Criminal Appeal in view of the fact that since the paper book is
ready and received by the Registry. She, therefore requested that
Appeal may be notified on final hearing board.

Mr.

L.B.Dabhi, learned APP for the Respondent – State of Gujarat
has no objection if appropriate order is passed in this regard.

Since the
prayer for suspension of sentence and to release the Applicant
convict on regular bail during pendency and final hearing of the
above numbered Criminal Appeal is not pressed for, no order is
required to be passed. However, Registry is directed to notify the
above numbered Criminal Appeal on final hearing board in seriatim.

Application
stands disposed of accordingly. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent.

(A.M.Kapadia,J)

(B.N.Mehta,J)

Jayanti*

   

Top