=========================================Appearance vs Ms Jirga Jhaveri on 13 July, 2011

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/753/2003	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 753 of 2003
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8726 of 1993
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI            Sd/- 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH               
Sd/- 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?    
			                                                         No
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?                         No
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?       
			                                                             No
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?                                        No
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?          No
		
	

 

=========================================
 

HARISH
M MANKODI 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT 

 

=========================================Appearance
: 
MR MANAV A
MEHTA for
the Appellant 
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, ASSTT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/07/2011 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)

1. We have
heard learned counsel Mr. Manav A. Mehta for the appellant and
learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the
respondent.

2. The
learned Single Judge has decided in favour of the petitioner and set
aside the order of compulsory retirement and modified the punishment.
Appeal against such an order is not maintainable as the appellant is
not an aggrieved person. No appeal lies against the finding or
punishment which was modified in favour of the petitioner. This
appeal is dismissed.

Sd/-

(V.M.

SAHAI, J.)

Sd/-

(G.B.

SHAH, J.)

omkar

Top