Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Appearance : vs : on 9 August, 2010
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8951/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8951 of 2010
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1873 of 2006
 

 
 
=========================================


 

KATIYABHAI
NEVABHAI MEDA, THRO' JATANBEN NAVABHAI MEDA 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 

 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JM BUDDHBHATTI for Applicant(s) : 1,MS HANSA V PATEL for Applicant(s)
: 1, 
MR. MINI NAIR, APPfor Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for
Respondent(s) : 2, 
========================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 09/08/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

RULE.

Ms.

Mini Nair, learned APP appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.

Having
regards to the facts of the case, the Application is taken up for
hearing today.

The
Applicant convict, who vide judgment and order dated 17.3.2006
rendered in Sessions Case No. 112 of 2005 by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Dahod, has been convicted for the offences
punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced
to imprisonment of life, has filed this application through his
widow mother, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period
of four weeks to enable him to attend the obsequious ceremony of his
elder uncle.

At
the time of hearing of this application, Ms. Hansa V. Patel, learned
Advocate for the Applicant accused does not press this
application and seeks leave to withdraw this application.

Ms.

Mini Nair, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat has
no objection if leave as prayed for is granted.

Hence,
leave to withdraw the application is granted. Application stands
rejected as it is withdrawn. Rule is discharged.

(A.M.Kapadia,J)

(J.C.Upadhyaya,J)

Jayanti*

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.150 seconds.