Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
SCA/4085/2008 2/ 2 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4085 of 2008
=========================================================
ARCHANA
HARIN MUNSHI - Petitioner(s)
Versus
THE
RECOVERY OFFICER & 1 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance
:
MR
DEEPAK VYAS for
Petitioner(s) : 1,
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1,
MR UDAY
R BHATT for Respondent(s) :
2,
=========================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
Date
: 22/08/2008
ORAL
ORDER
On
20th of August, 2008, an order was passed, relevant part
of it is as under:-
?SLearned
Advocate Mr.Uday Bhatt appearing for respondent No.2-Bank submitted
that on earlier occasions either the learned advocate has not
remained present or has filed sick note and that is why the matter is
not heard on merits since March 2008. The learned advocate for
respondent No.2-Bank submitted that the Bank has already filed its
reply.
Learned
Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank inform the learned advocate for the
petitioner that on 22nd August 2008, either the learned
advocate for the petitioner may make it convenient to remain present
before the Court or if it is not convenient to do so, he may make
alternative arrangement for presenting the case. The matter shall
proceed on 22nd August, 2008.??
2. Learned
Advocate Mr.Uday R. Bhatt, for respondent No.2-Bank apprises the
Court that learned advocate did inform the learned advocate for the
petitioner, but he was conveyed that learned advocate is out of
station and even today, he is out of station. Taking the lenient view
in the matter, one more opportunity is given to the petitioner.
3. The
matter is adjourned to 27th August, 2008 with an
understanding that on that day, the learned advocate for the
petitioner may proceed with the matter or make necessary arrangement
so that the matter proceeds.
[RAVI
R.TRIPATHI, J.]
bdd
Top