IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.22503 of 2011
1. Arfeen Nabi @ Md. Arfeen Nabi, son of late Akhtar Nabi
2. Ghoushia Sultana, wife of late Akhtar Nabi
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
2. 05.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case
instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 323, 504,
406/34, 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of
Dowry Prohibition Act.
Considering that the petitioners are brother-in-law
and the mother-in-law respectively and the case was instituted
just after one and half month of the marriage, let the petitioners
in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from
the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Rampur P.S.
Case No. 186 of 2010, shall be released on anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors
will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an
affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the
petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to
the court about any change in the address of the petitioners.
(ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will
2
receive the police papers on the given date and be present on
date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates
and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be
cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be
well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two
consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali