High Court Kerala High Court

Ariff Azad vs State Of Kerala on 16 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Ariff Azad vs State Of Kerala on 16 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8238 of 2009(Y)


1. ARIFF AZAD S/O. ABDUL KALAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,

3. SUB REGISTRAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.RAMASWAMY PILLAI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :16/03/2009

 O R D E R
                        S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                ------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No. 8238 OF 2009
              ----------------------------------------
               Dated this the 16th day of March, 2009

                           JUDGMENT

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader.

2. The petitioner submitted Exts.P1 and P2 documents

for registration before the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent

refuses to register the same on the ground that the consideration

mentioned in the documents are not the real consideration. The

question as to whether a Sub Registrar can refuse to register a

document on the ground of undervaluation has been the subject

matter of several decisions of this Court, two of which are

Periyar Real Estates V. State of Kerala [2002(1) KLT 806]

and All Kerala Document Writers and Scribes Association V.

State of Kerala [2005(3) KLT 234], in which this Court has

held that if the registering authority is of opinion that there is

undervaluation, the course open to him is to proceed under

Section 45B of the Stamp Act and he cannot refuse to register

the documents on that ground.

W.P.(c)No.8238/09 2

In view of the said legal position, this writ petition is

disposed of directing the respondents to accept originals of

Exts.P1 and P2 documents submitted by the petitioner and to

take necessary action for its registration and further action in

terms of the provisions contained in the Registration Act and

the Kerala Stamp Act in tune with the above said decision.

This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, immediately on

production of a copy of this judgment and resubmission of the

documents.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No.8238/09 3