High Court Madras High Court

Arulmugu Ponnambala Swamigal … vs The District Collector on 20 December, 2010

Madras High Court
Arulmugu Ponnambala Swamigal … vs The District Collector on 20 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE:  20.12.2010

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.28749 of 2010


Arulmugu Ponnambala Swamigal Matt
Rep.by its Managing Trustee
R.Gnanasambandam
No.33,Sadayappa Street,
Saidapet,Chennai-15.			...			Petitioner


						...Vs....
1.The District Collector
   Chengalpet Taluk,
   Kanchipuram District.

2.The Tahsildhar
   Chengalpet Taluk,
   Kanchipuram District.		...		       Respondents		

Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.05.2010 requesting to issue patta for the property situated in Survey No.217/C2,to an extent of 2 Acre situated in No.122, Sembakkam Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kanchipuram District, to dispose of the same.

		For Petitioner	  : Mr.G.Gokulavani

		For Respondents   : Mr.K.Balasubramanian
					    Special Government Pleader


O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 06.05.2010, on merits, within a specified period.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 06.05.2010, on merits and in accordance with law,after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the other persons concerned, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 06.05.2010, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Index:Yes/No 20.12.2010
Internet:Yes/No
arr

To

1.The District Collector
Chengalpet Taluk,
Kanchipuram District.

2.The Tahsildhar
Chengalpet Taluk,
Kanchipuram District.

Writ Petition No.28749 of 2010
M.JAICHANDREN,J.

arr

W.P.No.28749 of 2010

20.12.2010