High Court Kerala High Court

Arun Babu M vs The State Of Kerala on 5 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
Arun Babu M vs The State Of Kerala on 5 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 283 of 2011(I)


1. ARUN BABU M.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE MANAGER,

5. SRI.P.U.BIJU,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.E.HAMZA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :05/01/2011

 O R D E R
               T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                W.P.(C). No.283/2011-I
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011

                    J U D G M E N T

The petitioner herein was initially appointed as

U.P.S.A under the fourth respondent from 19/07/1999 and

was later promoted as H.S.A (Maths) against a leave

vacancy from 05/06/2004.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that when a

regular vacancy of H.S.A (Maths) arose on 16/02/2008,

instead of accommodating the petitioner, the fifth

respondent H.S.A. (S.S) has been adjusted against it.

It is contended that the petitioner ought to have been

accommodated against the regular vacancy in the light

of the principles stated by this Court in various

decisions.

3. The petitioner has already approached the

Government by filing Ext.P13 revision petition under

Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA K.E.R. It is prayed that the

Government may be directed to take a decision on

Ext.P13. The writ petition is hence disposed of

directing the first respondent to take a decision on

Ext.P13 revision petition after hearing the petitioner,

W.P.(C). No.283/2011
-:2:-

Manager and the fifth respondent and any other person

likely to be affected by the decision within a period

of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of

this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of

the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment

before the first respondent for compliance. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms