IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.31981 of 2010
ARUN KUMAR SINGH & ANR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners
namely Arun Kumar Singh and Manish Singh alias
Manikant Manish who apprehend their arrest in
connection with Complaint Case No.2218(c)/2009
for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and
417 of I.P.C. Also heard learned counsel for the
State as well as learned counsel appearing for
complainant.
It would appear from the contents of
complaint petition that complainant had taken loan
from the company of the petitioners for purchasing
the vehicle. Subsequently, in default of making
payment of the aforesaid loan, the aforesaid vehicle
was seized by the petitioners-company and after
settlement, the aforesaid vehicle was returned to
the complainant but it is alleged that some parts of
the aforesaid vehicle were found damaged.
In my view, in the facts and circumstances
2
petitioners, are entitled to get the privilege of
anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is
allowed and it is ordered that above stated
petitioners in the event of their arrest / surrender in
connection with Complaint Case No.2218(c)/2009,
shall be released on bail furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran
subject to condition as well as under Section 438(2)
of the Cr.P.C
( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)
pn