High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Arun Kumar Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 25 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Arun Kumar Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 25 August, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Criminal Miscellaneous No.21513 of 2011
                                  Arun Kumar Thakur
                                          Versus
                                  The State Of Bihar
                                         ----------

03. 25.08.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on

behalf of the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

State.

The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in

connection with Sakatpur P.S. Case No. 17/2011,

G.R. No. 755/2011, pending in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, is solitary named

accused in this case being a P.D.S. Dealer carries

allegation of shortage of grains etc.

Submission is that almost two years before

another suspended the shop of a different person

who also attached to the petitioner who as early as

on 1st April 2010 intimated the Block Supply Officer,

Tardih, Darbhanga, that he has taken additional

room on rent from one Modkant Thakur, S/o – lat

Bodh Narayan Thakur, Village – Mahiya, P.S. –

Sakatpur, District – Darbhanga, Khata No. 159,

Khesra No. 795 measuring 12 ft. x 10 ft. But in

spite of due intimiation no search was made from
2

where all such grains were available at the relevant

time.

Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender

within a period of four weeks, let the above-named

petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga,

in connection with Sakatpur P.S. Case No. 17/2011,

G.R. No. 755/2011, subject to condition under

section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

and additional condition to attend the court

regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the

case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure

on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable

explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to

be cancelled.

Rajeev/                            ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)