High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Arun Paswan &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Arun Paswan &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 September, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                              Cr.Misc. No.27009 of 2010

                     1.   ARUN PASWAN S/O LATE LEKHA PASWAN,
                     2.   AJHOLA DEVI W/O LATE LEKHA PASWAN,
                     3.   SANGITA DEVI W/O ARUN PASWAN,
                     4.   SEEMA DEVI W/O SUDHIR PASWAN,
                     5.   SUNAINA DEVI W/O SURESH PASWAN,
                              ALL R/O VILLAGE-DHURA, P.S. HALSI,
                              DISTRICT-LAKHISARAI.
                                               --PETITIONERS

                                            Versus

                          THE STATE OF BIHAR         --OPP.PARTY

2   23.09.2010

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The five petitioners are named accused in the

complaint case, being in-laws of the complainant, carry

general allegation of demand of dowry and torture etc. There

appears no medical support as regard to allegation of assault.

The grievance appears mainly against non-petitioner, the

husband.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the

petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four

weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each

of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate,
2

Lakhisarai, in Complaint Case no. 360 C of 2008, subject to

the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the

petitioner no.2, being male member, shall remain present

before the court below on each and every date for two years

or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the

petitioner no.1 fails to remain present on two consecutive

dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege

granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.

(Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

AAhmad