High Court Kerala High Court

Arun vs State – S.I. Of Police on 18 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Arun vs State – S.I. Of Police on 18 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3276 of 2009()


1. ARUN, S/O. RAVEENDRAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE - S.I. OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :18/06/2009

 O R D E R
                          K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                       ---------------------------
                          B.A.No.3276 of 2009
                       ----------------------------
                Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009




                               ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the first accused in

Crime No.382 of 2009 of Adimaly Police Station.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section

498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The defacto complainant filed a complaint before the

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Adimaly, which was forwarded to the

police for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure. Accordingly, the crime was registered.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the

view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. There will

be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the

officer in charge of the police station shall release him on bail on his

executing bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the

following conditions:

BA No.3276/2009 2

a) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for
interrogation as and when required;

b) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses
or tamper with the evidence;

c) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any
prejudicial activity while on bail;

d) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the
bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl