IN THE HIGH C0011"? OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED was THE 39?" mar OF 3uNE',.%2¢'a19VV.'.Tij'~ % T 1
BEFORE
ms HOWBLE MR. 3us'm:_e ASHf)K_ B. :~4:N§::~::N no. a2a;é3i'2oo9{%
ASADKHAN coif 0?.-${>L3SENS-SQ't':IE;*¥'Y'-.,LTD
288. MUJAWAR 'tE'.xAi.'.ii'.,:,V_BE!,CiAUM
BY rrs CH}\IRMAN} IBR}\HIM»'VfiAUSHAD K SH EK
AGED 33 %
R/O -- so-.M. ._ NV .....9e'm'1o:~zER
(By sax am. Ku--Li§ARN;:,AADv;)
nu... '»
:, .Ts%e.Ts"?§.TE §'?5.F"KAR?4A'YAKA
R13 THE. 'SECRETARY T6 REVENUE SE?-'ARTMENT
M 5 B£3ILEiNG,
DR A£'4E:ED=i(AR RGA§,
%.&.msAma.e»-560 301,.
ASSESTANT commssmgsaerz
,aEmAu1~1
A % ' X , we SUB-REGISTRAR,
BELGAUM.
4. MR AMBUSSALAM ABDULRAZAK INAMBAR
MAJOR, OCC NIL
R/0 MUJAWAR GALLI
BELGAUM
5. MR. MUSHRAF s/0 LATE ABDULS}*éTT;§§R"'MU3AW!iXR:"
MAJOR, occ: susmess A ' '
R/C} MUJAWAR GALLI, BELGAIM
5. MR. SHAHABUDDIN DILAWAR..M_GMIN
AGED MAJOR,
R/O I MAIN, III CROSS; SHIVA3-I j.NAGP.R;
8ELGAUM - _ 9»,"-.I;.,.RESPONDENTS
Tmsxvarr ~F:§1-i.ED UNEER ARTICLES 226 AND
22:? 01: THE C'(3–%§ST}3’UTIQf%i-{§F INDIA PRAYING T0 DIRECT THE
.RESPO§ii§ENT No.’1A*A§\;9 2% To PROCEED WITH THE sscnorsa 51
flgN°Q!}I”RY. IN} 9g’EsEEcT”6E LAND SY.l’%O..999 AREA 3 ACRES 5
G’Ul §T,?s.:S’0§’fv«B}E.?;(34:\i5§.M VILLAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AS
:f”<…A_Vv»DIRECFE9 mswmo.1ae4/mas, 1555 AND S7/1986 AND
9386/17999 v§).<:¥»'v*§3'DI'¥"I(3USLY.
LL TmsT>ETITIorI comma are ma r=RELI:~IIIuAav HEARING
THE’-AA.[5AI{, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORBER
The oetitioner has sought a writ of manda}f;’o’iiV:s;”:.t:o:”‘t.he
respondents No.1 and 2 to proceed with enc;u§ry*’-.’t:.i?nd1eAt::
5A of the Land Acquisition Act in rgisriect. oé théfiiétmi tat Sy.V 4′
No.999 measuring 8 acres 5 guntas of§é_§’éum’*\)iii~o,ge
the directions contained in W.P. §:o,j;as4/Aéstoanqoth駔petuéions.ii A
2. The facts of th’e*-.A§.4_:c:’fase–‘_iA:i tlieiipreiiminary
notification was issued on_.._1§_.9V8.;’$2:_a*h’d. t~h¢’«V”finai notification
(declaration) watsiis5;gec2% for the acqumition of the
$3965 for the’ gté;’pose_é3:i(i of the petitioner. Some of the
iand owgierg ciidai-igogédtthé acquisition proceedings in w.P.
it£fio[18VS4,i8é’ijarioi.A_othe%mtfionr§ected petitions. This Cetsrt, by its
otom:aciotetij~g’;Z;f:$i’;~1995 quashed the finai notification dated
2 ‘V”:£’9.08tS2, a1_s’nvo~” onquiry under Section 5A of the said Act was
Tfieréafter, the Government passed the: order dated
withdrawing these iands from the acquisition
” :pro.<_:éedings. The saié oroier dent:-tifying the mods was aiso
V"*t.ifk'A-bfiought to this Court in w.9. No.6193/01. This Court quashed
'' the denotification as the same was passed without hearing the
$354
4
beneficiary i.e., the petitioner herein. The Govemmentiadce its
order dated 15.Q6.08 turned down the fame ownerei..rexo’o*eet:”for
the deietion of these lands from the acquisition or ‘
3. Sri Kuikarni, the iearned :’cou:heei the ‘peteition_er
submits that the necessary 7di«.Ifection-sh the
Government to conciuee the enqeirifiihoer 5AEof the Act
and thereafter issue the Vfinai_An’otifieeti~o’eiAitiecieration ) under
Section 6(1) of the said Actvlli-V” ;; it
4. I_It __iettit’e.thet the-.a_cquisition of lands faii within the
eminent derneih iofthe direction can be given to the
Governrrgfentto acq.ni’re the iands. This petition is iiabie to be
:’v’rej’ecte:d7′ ‘afinotheirwreason. The preiiminary notification is
iss1fi’eV_ti’«-i’_oVfi”:i;§~..Q$.I.$$’; As per the Proviso 1 to Section 6(1)
‘w’inserted«..bya.__v;Act«:’~’No.68 of 1984, the finai notification cannot be
“”:7.4£’setiedVLafteif-the expiry of the three years from the date of the
4§ebi.iceti.o’n of the preiiminary notification, if the preiiewinary
‘ jn’ot.ifi.eation is issued before the commencement of Act 68 of
In View of this stetontory embargo, any direction to issue
0
5
the ma! notification or declaration is mt permés§i*$i§;’-..,, I
therefore, dismiss this writ ioetition.
5. Further, it is made clear t-i1″a”t”if.i;h”e; fi;r;.s§:re_Spohdé§at 9?
forms the epinior: that the lands aCgi;i~reé
benefit of the petitioner, it is opéniiigit to.”inii;i’at§j’i:hVé;:§&qii’isitio§i’
proceedings afresh. with Hfiis cbser$%_ati6-n, thi§’wr§t”V:petitien is
dismissed.
s3c*