In the High Court of Judicature at Patna
Cr. Misc. No.22380 of 2008
Asha Murmu & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr.
****
/3/ 02.07.2008 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead
the complainant as opposite party no. 2.
2. Issue notice to opposite party no. 2 to show cause
why the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the
petitioners in connection with Complaint Case No. 516 C of
2007 pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Araria, be not allowed.
3. Notice will go under ordinary process as well as
under registered cover with A/D for which requisites etc.
must be filed within one week, failing which this application,
as against the opposite party concerned, shall stand rejected
without further reference to a Bench.
4. Petitioner no. 1, Asha Murmu, is father-in-law,
petitioner no. 2, Talamani Devi, is mother-in-law, petitioner
no. 3, Suklal Murmui, is brother-in-law, petitioner no. 4,
Jagan Devi, and petitioner no. 6, Laxmi Devi, are sisters-in-
law, and petitioner no. 5, Babulal Marandi, is the husband of
petitioner no. 4. They are apprehending their arrest in
connection with the aforementioned case. Counsel for the
2
petitioners submits that there is misunderstanding in between
the complainant and her husband. So far petitioner are
concerned, they have been named being the family members.
5. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory
bail on behalf of the petitioners, above named, is allowed.
They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case
of their surrender before the Court concerned within two
weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
(rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each in connection with the aforementioned case to
the satisfaction of the above mentioned Court, subject to the
condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal
Procedure Code.
( Mridula Mishra, J. )
Cp:3S.A.