High Court Kerala High Court

Asharaf vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 29 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Asharaf vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 29 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6227 of 2009()


1. ASHARAF, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.SALAHUDEEN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE S.I.OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :29/10/2009

 O R D E R
                          K.T.SANKARAN, J.
             ------------------------------------------------------
                       B.A. NO. 6227 OF 2009
             ------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 29th day of October, 2009


                                O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in

Crime No.260 of 2009 of Paravur Police Station, Kollam District.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section

498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the

view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. There will

be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the

officer in charge of the police station shall release him on bail on his

executing bond for Rs.15,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like

B.A. NO.6227 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the

following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating
officer for interrogation as and when required;

b) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution
witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

c) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in
any prejudicial activity while on bail;

d) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned
above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/