High Court Kerala High Court

Ashish Namboodiri vs N.Noushad on 2 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
Ashish Namboodiri vs N.Noushad on 2 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 2133 of 2009()


1. ASHISH NAMBOODIRI,S/O.VAMANAN NAMBOODIRI
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. N.NOUSHAD,S/O.NOORMBOHAMMED, AGE NOT
                       ...       Respondent

2. K.NOORMOHAMMED, S/O.KHADIR MOIDEEN,

3. THE MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.BALAGOPAL

                For Respondent  :SRI.LIJU. M.P

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :02/08/2010

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                M.A.C.A. NO. 2133 OF 2009
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2010.

                       J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Palakkad in O.P.(MV)262/04. At

the out set, I may like to point out the methodology of

producing documents without examining any persons

creating confusion in the mind of everybody is to be

deprecated. When documents are produced before Court it is

to be properly explained so that the Court will know the

reality. I am not inclined to say anything further.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

appellant that the Tribunal in paragraph 13 of the award has

erred in taking into consideration the medical expenses. The

Tribunal did not accept the bills for the payment of advance

of Rs.13,000/- and Rs.5,000/-. Learned counsel would

contend that if the entire amount which is produced as bills is

taken into account and the advance amount is reduced it will

show that higher amount is available for medical expenses.

M.A.C.A. 2133 OF 2009
-:2:-

But it is a matter which has to be proved by examining the

person and giving an opportunity to the other side by cross-

examining him. I do not want to disallow it at this stage for

the reason if really amount is incurred for treatment it has to

be given to the party. Therefore I am inclined to grant an

opportunity for the limited purpose of proving the medical

bills and the medical expenses incurred by the claimant.

Therefore the award under challenge is set aside to the

limited extend to find out the actual medical expenses

incurred and for the said purpose the claimant as well as the

other parties are permitted to adduce both documentary as

well as oral evidence in support of their respective

contentions and then the matter be disposed of in

accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before

the Tribunal on 13.9.2010.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-