IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.43353 of 2010
ASHOK SAH, S/o Sitaram Sah.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
03. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for
the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Considering that there is no eye-witness to the
occurrence and there is only vague motive alleged against
the petitioner who happens to be the brother-in-law of the
wife of the deceased, let the petitioner, above named be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-
(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the
satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in
connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 120 of 2010
subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the
bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will
give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father
of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform
the Court if there is any change in the address of the
petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that
2
the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and
if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the
petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive
the police papers on the given date and be present on
date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two
given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his
bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of
misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on
each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates,
his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-