Gujarat High Court High Court

Ashok vs State on 30 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Ashok vs State on 30 November, 2010
Author: A.L.Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/14279/2010	 1/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 14279 of 2010
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 399 of 2007
 

 
=========================================================

 

ASHOK
@ HASMUKHBHAI PUNAMCHAND CHHOVALA, THRO' TRIGUNABEN & 1 -
Applicants
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondents
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
SATYAM Y CHHAYA and MR
HARNISH V DARJI for Appellants. 

 

PARTY-IN-PERSON
for Applicants. 
MR AJ DESAI, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondents 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 30/11/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

Rule.

Mr. A.J.Desai, learned A.P.P., waives service of notice of rule on
behalf of the respondents.

2. Heard
the party-in-person and learned A.P.P. Mr.Desai for the respondents.

3. Kishan,
son of convict Ashokbhai @ Hasmukhbhai Punambhai Chhovala is getting
married on 14.12.2010 and, therefore, the applicant has asked for
release of prisoners Ashokbhai @ Hasmukhbhai Punambhai and
Dhansukhbhai Punambhai Chhovala, on temporary bail for 20 days.

4. Considering
the averments made in the application, this application is allowed
for applicant No.1, Ashokbhai @ Hasmukhbhai Punambhai Chhovala. He
is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of 20 days
from the date of his release, on his executing a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) before the jail
authority.

5. So
far as application qua applicant No.2, Dhansukhbhai Punambhai
Chhovala is concerned, it stands rejected.

Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

D.S.Permitted.

[A.L.Dave,J.]

[V.M.Sahai,J.]

(patel)

   

Top