High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 17 September, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 17 September, 2008
LPA No.281 of 2004                                             [1]

THE     HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND                       HARYANA           AT
                   CHANDIGARH.



                                    L. P.A. No.281 of 2004

                                    Date of Decision: 17 - 09- 2008



Ashwani Kumar Sharma                                   ....Appellant


                              v.

State of Haryana and another                           ....Respondents



CORAM:      HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
            HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

                              ***

Present:    Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate
            for the appellant.

            Mr.Sunil Nehra, AAG, Haryana
            for the respondents.

                             ***

HEMANT GUPTA, J.

The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment rendered

by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 13.7.2004 whereby the

appellant’s writ petition claiming writ of mandamus directing the

respondents to consider the appellant for promotion to the post of Labour

Inspector was dismissed.

The appellant was appointed as Draftsman on 3.12.1970 on the

basis of his qualification of Matric and two years diploma in Draftsman

(Civil). The promotional avenues from the post of Draftsman is to the post

of Cartographer by virtue of Rule 9(h)(i) of the Haryana Labour Department
LPA No.281 of 2004 [2]

(Group C) Service Rules, 1982. But it is alleged that substantially there is

no promotion, as pay scale for the post of Draftsman and the pay scale for

the post of Cartographer is the same. Since the pay scales of the posts of

Draftsman and the Cartographer is the same, therefore, the appellant’s claim

for the promotion to the post of Labour Inspector by treating him as

Cartographer was declined.

The appellant is admittedly a Draftsman and has not been

promoted as Cartographer when the writ petition was filed. The post of

Draftsman does not fall within the feeder post. Therefore, merely on the

basis of the pay scale, the appellant cannot claim promotion to the post of

Labour Inspector. Learned Single Judge has examined the claim of the

appellant in detail and has found that the claim of the appellant is not

justified. We are in agreement with the reasoning given by the learned

Single Judge, which warrants no interference in appeal.

The present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.




                                         ( HEMANT GUPTA )
                                              JUDGE


                               ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA )
September 17, 2008                        JUDGE
RC