Gujarat High Court High Court

Ashwinbhai vs Aniketben on 25 August, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Ashwinbhai vs Aniketben on 25 August, 2011
Author: Md Shah,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/403/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 403 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

ASHWINBHAI
VALLABHBHAI LATHIYA C/O VALLABHBHAI S LATHIYA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

ANIKETBEN
ASHWINBHAI LATHIYA & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
NOTICE
NOT RECD BACK for
Applicant(s) : 1,PARTY-IN-PERSON for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MS AMI N
BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1, 
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :
2, 
RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 3, 
NOTICE SERVED for
Respondent(s) :
4, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 25/08/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

The
present petitioner-husband of respondent no.1 Aniketben preferred
this petition praying for reducing the sentence imposed by the trial
Court for not making payment towards the maintenance as per the order
passed by the Court.

On
18.8.2011, this Court has passed the following order:

“The
petitioner, party-in-person, is present. He states that the matter is
settled between the present petitioner and respondent-wife, and they
have taken divorce because as per their customs, divorce is
permissible. He places copy of divorce deed on record, which is
ordered to be taken on record. S.O. to 25.8.2011.”

Today,
respondent no.1-Aniketben is present and she is identified by
learned advocate Ms.Ami Bhatt. Learned advocate Ms.Bhatt for
respondent no.1, on instructions, submits that the matter is settled
between the parties and divorce has taken place between the parties
and now nothing is required to be done in this matter.

In
view of the above, this petition is disposed of.

(
M.D.Shah, J )

srilatha

   

Top