High Court Jharkhand High Court

Ashwini Kumar Dutt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 12 August, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Ashwini Kumar Dutt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 12 August, 2011
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                       W.P.(S) No. 2719 of 2011

                    Ashwini Kumar Dutt..........       ...      ...       .......Petitioner
                                        ­V e r s u s­
                    The State of Jharkhand and others... ...              Respondents
                                               ...

CORAM: ­ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL

                    For the Petitioners        : ­ Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad
                    For the Respondents        : ­ J.C. to Sr. S.C.II
                                               ...                                      
                           th
               02/Dated: 12 August, 2011

1. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for disposal of this 
writ   petition,   if   a   direction   is   given   to   respondent   no.2,   to   treat   this   writ 
petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilated in this writ 
petition   in   accordance   with   law,   within   stipulated   time,   as   given   by   this 
Court.

2.  Counsel appearing for the State has no much objection if a direction is given 
to respondent no.2 to decide the claim of the present petitioner in accordance 
with law, within stipulated time, as given by this  Court.

3.     In view of these submissions, I hereby, direct respondent no. 2 to treat this 
writ petition along with annexures as a representation and decide the claim 
of the present petitioner for grant of benefit of Assured Carreer Progression 
and   Senior   Selection   Grade,   as   prayed   in   this   petition   since   he   has   now 
retired, in accordance with law, rules, regulations, polices and Government 
enforceable   orders,   applicable   to   the   petitioner   as   expeditiously   as 
expeditiously   as   possible   and   practicable,   preferably   within   a   period   of 
sixteen weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of an order of this Court, 
after giving an adequate opportunity of being heard to the petitioner or to his 
representative.   

4. In view of the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. 

                                                   (D.N. Patel, J.)

sudhir/