High Court Karnataka High Court

Aslam @ Mitayi Aslam vs State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Aslam @ Mitayi Aslam vs State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
   

wmwwrmsa W» I'-l'EW6\I'¢l"hfll""&l'AJ'Q. mew!"  NMRQVMERRR TQIWJFQ Mvfidwmi 'Jr fiflfiwflgmfifi          

CRL.P..Ka.3£55jO3

xi"

IN THE HIGH COURT GE' KfiLRI'l'A'l'AEA AT Baf£HG£.LORE
DATED 'THIS THE 21" DAY GP FEBRUARY 2009

BEFORE

THE HOBPBLE Dr. JUSHGE K. Baaxmmvnméia § /L   : 
cmtrmz. PE'1'I'l'I0!'? Na.52.$5"GF.:1Q_{j§   %=     A

BE'l'WEEN:

1.Aa1am Q Hitayi Adm
81:: Ifiuddin,

Aged 40 years, One:
Bnaineu. Rfat No. 1315,
5"' Grass, Hothinagar,
R31'. Hagar Post,
Bmgalare.

ihhyuh Kha.n@ Ta1wa3~.:x*':%;f1 i;h  2; 
Sic: Iqbal Khan, A_  ~ «
Yaars,{}cc:  R)' as-.tg 

Ho. 12} 4, 3
liuhm PI.1I'&3I1;,' 'B11aI;rat;3':ti '7} 
Na.aar.B~anaI1?rB-_ --   '

(BY SRI.C.R. 

. ..PETITIGNER8

   ..... 
B'Y(3UBBO§_P..-P;RK_' m1.1cE.
     ...amPom:>Em

_ '   Crh11;&1aI Psfifim in am undw 8-eciziun 439 of <)r.P.C.,
 «:pra'y~.i.:jzg '£i£)'w,m3£1'3¢ he puawanm on bait in sc.IIa.941/2003
  file ofthe Fast Track Caurt--X', Bangalore afcuhhon
 'Pgrltfiiniipefot the ofimce pin]: I43. 120(3). 300,, 511, Rfw Sec.

  and 3, 25, 27 aim-ma Act.

   criminal Petition coming on for mam, this day. the
 C'§:rurtmadathafiol1ow5ng-



amwmnm Mr nnmmnamna nawn hwmfli ,M,?' mnxmmammm Hiwfl muwx: vi" QCAKNAIAKA MIWH h'€fiJR"I Q!' KARNATAKA H!GH CQUX? Q? KQRNRXEWKR HWEH CQUW

CRI..P.Hc:.525.5j.9B

ORDER

1. The paizitinnxsf uccuusd-1 and .5 m1%e%:;z§¢,}941;2otraLk§a%’
tha ii]: of the Fast T1-ask C.ourt–X

com undw section 439 oft}:-.P.C L

2. Lava:-nezi aounsal for
the putifinn £33. so for as the amp. 1 .

3. Hard    the pertitimm-..
filawuwd-Sis    4    %  1 %

4.   the peiice have
we mute   the petitions" under

sacnizm us, .12o(B j;; nfw. :4§*aIi’ and 3. 25, 27 ofhrmshct ma
the aficer has
511 EC by way of filing at mmo. He

xrth. at on seized’ from tha prrenuzt accused was

– and the prosucution has not made out at

‘j E’;-filfl for the above said ofiauoavs.

‘V V Lamed Gevt. Piaaziar submit: that me mate camplnfit
twinned by the palice and the cacnteatian that the wmpon

seizad fi-om the prenmt pditionufaecused-5 wan not in working

7

.»u-mu.

* -*~”-“”xf* nu-mmnmmmm nswzfl %…UUKl U? KARNATAKA HIGH Cfliifi?’ G? KARNATAKA HEGH COUR?’ OF i(ARNA”¥’AKfi4 Hl$H CQUR

cnL.p.xa.525s;;:a

condition holds no water and than is no good

thepdzflimmonhafl.

the case of praaecutian that culprits
murder the rowtiy «hum Ttmnvar. VI’z§§s%no ‘V

7. The bail petitian offifiiiz3:£1aavEV”§o;1L’V5.§g.:di3;n£usad as not
pruned. flail Pam”. ‘V the same is

rgeeted. ‘ P

kvrl