High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Astha (Minor) Through Sh Ramesh … vs Central Board Of Secondary … on 14 July, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Astha (Minor) Through Sh Ramesh … vs Central Board Of Secondary … on 14 July, 2008
Civil Writ Petition No. 11234 of 2008                              1


   IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                  CHANDIGARH
                                    --

                              Civil Writ Petition No. 11234 of 2008
                              Date of decision: 14.07.2008


Astha (minor) through Sh Ramesh Trehan (father)        ........Petitioner

            Versus

Central Board of Secondary Education                .......Respondent(s)

Coram:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
            HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
                         -.-

Present:    Mr. B B Bagga, Advocate
            for the appellant

            Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate
            for the respondent
                   -.-

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (Oral)

The petitioner is aggrieved by the award of 1 mark out of 315

marks in the entrance examination for AIEEE-2008.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

had secured 88.6% marks in the marticulation examination, conducted by

the Central Board of Secondary Education and also secured 77.2% marks in

her 10+2 examination. However, in the entrance examination for AIEEE-

2008, she has been awarded 1 mark out of 315 marks. It is submitted that

there seems to be some mistake in awarding the marks to the petitioner in

the entrance examination for AIEEE-2008.

Mr. Aggarwal, Counsel appearing for the Board, argued that

the question paper in the entrance examination for AIEEE was of objective
Civil Writ Petition No. 11234 of 2008 2

type and there was a system of negative marking. He submits that due to

the negative marking, the petitioner has secured only 1 mark out of 315

marks. He has also shown us the answer sheet of the petitioner. A perusal

thereof, shows that the candidates were given OMR sheet and the answers

attempted were scanned through computer and accordingly, the marks were

awarded. Because of the negative marking in the objective type question

paper, the petitioner secured such low marks. We find nothing wrong with

the marking done in the case of the petitioner.

In view of the above, there is no merit in the writ petition and

the same is dismissed.

[ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA]
JUDGE

[NIRMALJIT KAUR]
JUDGE
July 14, 2008
mohan
Civil Writ Petition No. 11234 of 2008 3